Commercial intelligence for your cloud spend.
Reconstruct your commercial position from contracts,
billing, consumption and commitments.
Know where you stand before you act.
Why Reclaim
Cloud auditing.
Built to move faster.
Reclaim’s AI auditing engine turns complex cloud spend into a clear commercial advantage. It connects contracts, costs and usage with forecasting and negotiation strategy.
We built Reclaim to challenge the long timelines and high fees of traditional consulting. Designed to reduce manual work and overhead, our system delivers rigorous, evidence-backed analysis to help you make better commercial decisions sooner.
Core
features
Spend & usage intelligence
Understand what you use, what you pay, and where the two diverge.
Commitment strategy
Align Savings Plans and reserved capacity with the demand ahead.
Enterprise applications
Match Salesforce and HubSpot licences to the work your people do.
Outcome verification
Trace agreed terms through to the invoices. See what actually changed.
The gap is not waste. It is information.
Vendors understand their own commercial structures far better than their customers do. The customer usually holds the evidence that would close the gap, and rarely holds it in one place.
The counterparty structures these continuously
Vendors know their pricing, contracts, discount mechanics, commitment economics and renewal timing in depth. That knowledge is their working environment. For the buyer it is an occasional event.
The evidence is fragmented across the buyer's own systems
Contracts sit with legal, invoices with finance, consumption with engineering, requirements with the business. Each is real. None of them is the position, and nobody holds all four.
Most advice earns from the size of the number
Resellers take margin on spend. Partners earn on committed spend. Cost tools report the past. Structural incentives point one direction, and it is not always the buyer's.
Understand. Optimise. Negotiate. Verify.
Understand
What exists, what is consumed, what is committed — and what is missing.
- Contracts and commercial structure
- Billing reconciled against consumption
- Commitment inventory and coverage
- Gaps named rather than estimated
Optimise
What the business actually requires, and what the position should become.
- Requirements, not last quarter's trend
- Headroom under forecast growth
- Sequencing before commitment
- Structure, not only price
Negotiate
The evidence and the optimised position, turned into a defensible strategy.
- Targets defined before the first meeting
- Every proposal modelled against your data
- Concession order set in advance
- You keep the vendor relationship
Verify
What was agreed, against what was actually billed.
- Executed terms tracked to the invoice
- Variance attributed to a cause
- Reconciliation signed by your finance team
- Realised, not projected
Two pricing models. Two practices.
Consumption-priced infrastructure and entitlement-priced applications fail in opposite ways. Cloud waste hides inside a commitment already purchased; licence waste hides behind a seat that bills identically either way.
AWS
Commitments are fixed-term purchase obligations that carry a discount. What they should be is decided by forward requirement and contract structure — not by extrapolating last quarter.
All of AWSEnterprise Applications
A licensed seat bills identically whether it is used every hour or never again. Nothing in the invoice distinguishes the two, so nothing prompts anyone to look.
All of Enterprise ApplicationsEvery material conclusion should have a reason.
A number that can be calculated is not the same as a conclusion that can be supported. Where the evidence does not support a conclusion, the right output is to say so — not to publish a figure that happens to compute.
Five evidence states, kept distinct
- 01
Observed
Measured from your own billing and usage data.
- 02
Forecast
Modelled forward, with assumptions stated. Never presented as measurement.
- 03
Recommended
The position the evidence supports. Not yet agreed with anyone.
- 04
Negotiated
What was actually executed. Frequently narrower than what was recommended.
- 05
Realised
What the invoices show. The only figure that ever reached the P&L.
Collapsing any pair above produces a more impressive number and a less defensible one. Missing information stays visible as missing rather than becoming a silent zero.
Asked before every engagement.
How is this different from a cost-optimisation tool?
Cost tools can provide valuable reporting and recommendations. Our focus is to combine that evidence with forward requirements and contract terms, establish a commercial position, and verify the outcome against subsequent invoices.
The methodologyDoes optimisation always mean cutting?
No. Sometimes the supported conclusion is to restructure a commitment, change its timing, preserve capacity, increase coverage, defer a decision, or collect evidence that does not yet exist. We start from your position rather than from a savings target, and occasionally the answer is that your current structure is already correct.
CommitmentsWhy would we trust a number you produced?
Because material conclusions are traceable to the evidence behind them, and because where the evidence does not support a conclusion we report the gap instead of publishing a figure. Unknown is not treated as zero.
What we refuseBook a commercial audit
Stage 00 is a 30-minute qualifying call at no cost. If the timing or the estate does not justify an engagement, we say so on that call.